
Out of Stock
Vertiv VRA9045 Colocation Kit 48U 600 x 1,200 mm | Rack, Enterprise
Vertiv
MPN: VRA9045
$2,129.67$3,088.00
MAP: $1,945.44
Free shipping on orders over $500
Authorized Dealer — Full manufacturer warranty
Key Features
- 48U colocation kit format
- 600 x 1,200 mm size specification
- Vertiv branded infrastructure component
- Designed for rack layout consistency
- Supports high-density deployment planning
- Useful for standardized colocation environments
- Standardize colocation layouts with a 48U rack footprint
- Fit planned deployments using a 600 x 1,200 mm size profile
Design colocation space with dimensions that support disciplined rack planning. The Vertiv VRA9045 colocation kit is specified for 48U, 600 x 1,200 mm deployments, making it a fit for environments where cabinet sizing and layout consistency matter as much as the equipment inside. In colocation facilities, small dimensional mismatches can complicate airflow planning, cable routing, and service access. A kit built around a defined footprint helps reduce those problems before they start.
This is the kind of component procurement teams choose when the goal is to standardize installations across multiple racks or suites. It supports a repeatable deployment model, which is valuable when you are balancing density, maintainability, and space allocation. For teams comparing options, the value is not just the size itself — it is the confidence that the physical layout will align with the rest of the infrastructure plan.
Use it where predictable rack geometry is required and where the cost of rework is higher than the cost of getting the specification right the first time.
Ideal For
- Colocation cabinet planning for 48U deployments
- Standardizing rack dimensions across multiple suites
- High-density infrastructure layouts requiring fixed geometry
- Projects where predictable rack sizing reduces installation rework
Why This Product
- 1Defined 48U footprint for predictable rack planning
- 2600 x 1,200 mm sizing for standardized colocation layouts
- 3Better suited to structured deployments than ad hoc cabinet sizing
- 4Supports density planning where space efficiency matters






